I don’t like you in that way either!

The following item appeared on idontlikeyouinthatway.com this morning, ushering in a new era of me not reading that site anymore.

“Sex and the City was a groundbreaking show that ushered in a new era of female empowerment. The characters and he [sic] stars who played them are feminist heroes, who prove that a woman’s merit should not be based on her looks alone. Oh, wait. Scratch that. Page Six reports:

‘Maybe seeing themselves on the big screen was too much to take for “Sex and the City” stars Cynthia Nixon and Kristin Davis. Apparently, soon after the movie’s release, they both paid a visit to Roosevelt Hospital on 10th Avenue for minor surgeries. “Cynthia had a breast augmentation and soon after, Kristin had the varicose veins on her legs removed,” said an insider. “They both made sure they did it on the quietest day of the week.” It could explain why Davis always wears long hems. Nixon, whose rep denied the surgery, could have been disappointed with her topless scene. Davis’ rep had no comment.”‘
Wow, nothing says confident feminist icon like sneaking into a doctor’s office and secretly getting plastic surgery. Granted, all these chicks are hags, so why not Sarah Jessica Parker? The legend says our primitive tools and surgical techniques are no match for her sinister demonry. Run for your life!!”

No, you know what, this is some kind of bullshit. This article was obviously written by a dude who is looking for an excuse to harpoon these “hags”, because why? Chicks would rather sit in a theater and watch them for two hours, instead of reading the misogynist babble he puts on his website? Age old male response: attack what threatens you.

Sex and the City has been hailed as groundbreaking and iconic, but it was really just a TV show that women watched because it was involving and entertaining. And yes, even relatable. Does that mean that the stars of that show are somehow required to be saints of the feminist movement?

Furthermore, why can’t feminists get cosmetic procedures if they want to? Isn’t the whole point of empowerment being able to make those kinds of decisions for oneself, without having to please other people (read: bloggers)? If Kristin Davis wants to get the varicose veins on her legs removed, so be it! Cynthia Nixon wants bigger boobs, more power to her and her lady lover! The whole point of the episode (and possibly the entire series) where Samantha gets her chemical peel is that woman should be empowered to do whatever they feel necessary to make them confident in who they are — be it ending a bad relationship, getting fertility treatments, or even buying a ridiculously expensive pair of shoes. Not everyone has to agree with cosmetic surgery, but then again, not everyone has to get plastic surgery. My body, my choice.

Also, just to put things in perspective, these are the women that blogger called “hags”:


5 responses to “I don’t like you in that way either!

  1. Good job yo 🙂 So glad you’re blogging again!!!

  2. dont hate on idontlikeyouinthatway, it says thats reported from page 6!

  3. They look like HAGS to me

  4. They are HAGS! Consider what they looked for in casting. Anyone considering them as their feminist hero, as well as the definition of such, is looking in the wrong place. SIMPLY put it is only a television show for entertainment purposes and is directed as such. Why read into it? Great that she got the surgery…maybe I will not be disgusted when they flash those lopsided things for no other reason than shock value. You think that constitutes a stand on feminism? The only reason I watched was to see how the slut was getting f’cked next.duh! If you want over-bearing feminist icons….try “The View”!

  5. Mind you, beauty is in the eye of the beholder, isn’t it? And it’s a fairly universal opinion among men (The ones I know, at least), that the majority of the cast members on SatC aren’t what you’d call good-looking. They have great bodies, but they’re not good-looking. In fact, I think Maxim recently voted SJP as one of the top six least-attractive celebrities of all time.
    In defense of SatC, it is a guilty pleasure for a lot of women – It’s a release valve for a lot of women who liked it for being honest. Still… As a guy, he approaches it from a different perspective, and your response of blankly boycotting the site seems a little.. outrageous, don’t you think? Especially because in berating him for berating women, you are in essence behaving a little like him.
    This is why I’m not particularly willing to admit that I’m a feminist in a group of my friends anymore.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s